Nima Abdullahzadeh games intellectual property protection methods: The blocking of movie download sites , the anger of the users of these sites , filing a complaint with Netflix, and finally Netflix’s unexpected and controversial response to the Iranian platform “Namava” was a chain of events that confronts Iranian platforms and their users with a serious question: if the real owners of the content And if the copyright holders want to react to what is happening in Iran, what options do they have in front of them? In this article, in a conversation with Nima Abdullahzadeh, legal expert familiar with international copyright cases, we answer this important question. Read even more information at نیما عبدالله زاده.
But what you’ve read so far is only a small part of what can happen to copyright infringers. When the problem becomes more serious, the owner of the work may turn to infrastructure such as hosting, domain and CDN companies. Nima Abdullahzadeh explains: For example, maybe an Iranian platform is using the Cloudflare service or is using a foreign data center. Here, the type of treatment depends on the country where the company is located. For example, the policies of an American company differ from a Swiss company based on the laws of its country, but in general, there is a risk that companies providing infrastructure will block Iranian platforms because through the infrastructure, illegal work [according to the laws of the same company and country ] in processing.
After presenting the headlines of the conference, Nima Abdullahzadeh explained the importance of intellectual property at the beginning of the speech and by explaining that intellectual property basically refers to anything that is created with thought, she said that basically a game is considered a constructive intellectual property that consists of components. There are different types and each game is an Intellectual Property (IP). Abdullahzadeh further added that by making games, game makers have in fact created IP, and if there were no copyright and intellectual property, there would be no game industry.
The legal expert, Nima Abdullahzadeh, says that such an action is highly unlikely because taking a case of copyright infringement to court costs between 300,000 and 500,000 dollars in the United States: “Foreign companies until they are sure that the money they spend will be returned or they will be hit.” They don’t do this if they enter the other side. Because the cost of copyright infringement complaints is a significant cost even for large companies. This is while the DMCA has a very limited cost and removes copyright infringing companies from platforms. According to the recent events, the owners of foreign works are certainly now considering their options, and it is not unlikely that the application of these services will be removed from Google Play as the first option.
Abdullahzadeh further pointed to the differences between the copyright law in Iran and the United States and said that in Iran, the law deals with the violator who knowingly violates IP in a criminal manner and with a prison sentence. The copyright law in Iran is defined 30 years after the death of the last author and creator, and this right can be inherited. American law says that if an American work is used, it must be registered in a special system in order to use copyright laws. In Iran, the producer does not need to register a copyright and the works receive this right from the time of publication.
Nima Abdullahzadeh: The industry is formed with income, and if there is no intellectual property, they are practically not a game industry either. At the beginning, I personally expected that this speech would be well received, considering the importance of the copyright issue in Iran and the world and the connection of this issue with the publishing of games in the world markets, but the reception cannot be considered acceptable.